Scan
With permission, a read-only review maps relevant architecture, methods, and data flows across the agreed systems.
Start engagement
OI Tech Patent reviews repositories, databases, and infrastructure to identify potential invention candidates for attorney review. We develop the strongest candidates into claims and prepare approved U.S. patent applications for filing.
Enter a public GitHub repository in the exact format below. OI Tech Patent will retrieve selected source files from its current default-branch commit and run an automated preliminary technical scan.
github.com/acme-labs/streamkit
github.com/nimbus/edge-cache
| No. | Workstream | Deliverable | Client outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | System review | Invention-candidate map | Potential technical concepts organized for attorney review |
| 02 | Prior-art review | Search record and analysis | Relevant references and distinctions documented |
| 03 | Application drafting | Claims and specification | Client-approved filing package |
| 04 | Brand and software protection | Eligible copyright and trademark filings | Rights held by the client as stated in the engagement agreement |
Three coordinated stages, with client approval before any filing.
With permission, a read-only review maps relevant architecture, methods, and data flows across the agreed systems.
Potential invention candidates are compared with relevant prior art and evaluated by counsel for a filing recommendation.
Counsel drafts the application, the client confirms inventorship and assignment details, and approved materials are filed.
The review isolates methods, flows, and data structures that may support patent claims. Counsel then evaluates novelty, non-obviousness, and filing strategy; no search can guarantee a patent grant.

Eligibility and patentability depend on the specific facts, prior art, and governing law. Common review areas include:
Caching, scheduling, data pipelines, deployment, and orchestration methods.
Technical model architectures, training procedures, inference, and serving improvements.
Search, ranking, matching, compression, and indexing techniques.
Synchronization, authentication, messaging, and consensus methods.
Technical interaction models, automation flows, and visualization methods.
Eligible logo artwork and software code for copyright; names and logos for trademark review.
The signed engagement agreement defines the filing scope, government fees, prosecution work, and any exclusions before work begins.
One-time service fee for the agreed scan, review, drafting, and initial U.S. filing scope.
Start engagementConflicts clearance and a signed engagement agreement are required before representation begins.
Copyright does not protect names or short phrases. Trademark and copyright filings depend on clearance, eligibility, client approval, and agency examination; registration is not guaranteed.
Candidate concepts, relevant prior art, open questions, and filing recommendations are kept together for review.
Inventorship, assignments, approvals, and filing receipts are documented as part of the client file.
Patent-pending status begins after a qualifying patent application is filed. It does not begin when a scan starts or when a candidate is identified. We provide the official filing receipt after submission.
The standard service target and any expedited deadline are stated in the signed engagement agreement. Timing begins only after conflicts clearance, access, required inventor information, and client approvals are complete.
Access is limited to the systems and permissions approved for the engagement. Security, retention, confidentiality, and deletion commitments are documented before access is granted. An NDA can be completed when appropriate.
Applications identify the legally correct inventors and are assigned to the client when the required rights and documents are in place. The signed engagement agreement controls ownership of work product and filed rights.
Qualifying original logo artwork and software source code may be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. Company names, software/product names, and source-identifying logos are evaluated for trademark protection because names and short phrases are not copyrightable. All filings are subject to clearance, eligibility, client approval, and agency review.
The $5,999.99 service fee covers the work specifically listed in the signed engagement agreement. Government filing fees, additional applications or trademark classes, office-action responses, prosecution, international filings, and other work are included only when the agreement says so.
Begin with a scoped conversation about the systems you want reviewed and the rights you want to protect.